منتشرشده در خرید vpn ویندوز





ایالات متحده یک بار بر مسابقه آسمان ها مسلط شده بود. این چه اتفاقی افتاده است برای اطلاعات بیشتر توسط B1M در حال حاضر مشترک شوید:

آیا هرگز بلندترین ساختمان جهان دیگر وجود دارد؟ –

داستان کامل این ویدیو ، از جمله تصاویر و پیوندهای مفید را در اینجا بخوانید:

محتوای آسمان خراش بیشتر توسط The B1M –

روایت شده توسط فرد میلز.

فیلم و تصاویر اضافی از وینگ ، کارلوس باریا ، KPF ، SkyscraperPage.com.

مشاهده این فیلم و موارد دیگر در –
ما را در توییتر دنبال کنید –
مثل ما در فیس بوک –
ما را در LinkedIn دنبال کنید –
ما را در اینستاگرام دنبال کنید –

#construction #skyscraper #architecture

ما از شما برای به اشتراک گذاشتن مطالب خود برای الهام بخشیدن به دیگران استقبال می کنیم ، اما لطفاً با قوانین ما خوب باشید و بازی کنید:

محتوای ما فقط با تنظیم ممکن است در وب سایت های شخص ثالث جاسازی شود. برای به اشتراک گذاشتن مطالب خود و کمک به دسترسی مخاطبان گسترده تری ، با دامنه ها همکاری ایجاد کرده ایم. اگر علاقه مند به همکاری با ما هستید با [email protected] تماس بگیرید.

پاره کردن و / یا ویرایش این فیلم غیرقانونی است و منجر به اقدام قانونی خواهد شد.

© 2019 The B1M Limited.

لینک دانلود

تگ ها:

36 پاسخ به “چگونه آمریکا مسابقه آسمان خراش را از دست داد | B1M”

  1. Huge THANK YOU to everyone that watched our channel this year – we love our viewers so much and know that we would be nothing without you!!! 👍👍💙

  4. As a European with barely any skyscrapers, the Speed in which China is building is insane, whether that be skyscrapers or roads/bridges, they're rapid.
    I personally don't think Europe needs skyscrapers (at least not yet) but the art of Europe is it's old design and feel.
    It's what makes Europe Europe if that makes sense, America was the new world so it's visions were to be different and new.
    As good as a skyline look from afar, I don't necessarily believe its that good up close, the building is good architecture, yes, but they block out the sun and it just feels clogged… But I suppose that's the future when you need to supply apartments for millions of people in such small spaces.
    Look at Hong Kong, 355 skyscrapers in such a small place, it looks good from across the water, but the in the city…

  7. It's not that America lost the skyscraper race to other countries, it's that America wasn't even interested in competing. Even now with a slate of new skyscrapers in the works, I think there's less interest in competitve height and more on luxury. Competing for the tallest buildings have long been passe in America. For other countries that's not the case because they've come into their own relatively late.

  9. The reason the US no longer builds sky scrapers is because tall buildings look like phallic symbols which is just another reminder of the patriarchy. When you have a skyline full of phallic symbols it is a statement that gender diversity is not tolerated. The US has moved toward building 'earth scrapers'. Earth scrapers are deep trenches that are constructed deep in the ground. They are every bit as good as sky scrapers, but they don't get the same recognition. There are some skyscrapers in the process of transitioning into earth scrapers and vice versa. We are unsure of what to do about these transitioning structures at the moment. Don't get cocky, China. (I apologize for the use of the word 'cocky' which is yet another reminder of our oppressive patriarchal society.) Don't get arrogant, China! Soon you will be faced with the problem of an oppressive phallic skyline.

  12. How America Lost the Skyscraper Race？
    The next question is why does the United States use all national power to suppress Huawei?

    Why did China start to comprehensively contain China?
    The answer came out. . . .

  13. Not a mention about how US corporations have largely move away from skyscrapers to suburban corporate campuses? Corporate culture in the US generally does not like skyscrapers anymore, instead favoring the newer campuses that were pioneered by the tech giants. Campuses are more efficient, cheaper, and resemble the universities that skilled workers are familiar with.

  19. Here in China just a few cities really need to build such numerous skyscrapers: Beijing, Hongkong, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou. But for the reason that China is under control of Communist, most of the cities in China are trapped by the race of skyscraper-construction, building far more skyscrapers than actually needed. In this case, lots of cities in China are suffered from extremely high vacancy rates, both office buildings and apartments.

  20. As an American, frankly? I don't care if we "lose". You're welcome for idea. It originated in New York City. First Skyscrapers were there. So what if someone else makes them bigger? There HAS to be better geography and grounds to build them bigger and taller, than in that crowded city of spires, already. So, again. I dont care if we lose the race. I'd argue, that's not the point. The race is: humanity building towers to reach to the sky. Go people go!!!! ANYBODY!!! Build! them! Taller!!!!! And, again. You're welcome. 🙂

  22. anyone interested in this video, I highly recommend u to search skyline China, a YouTube channel, or just search shanghai city view, etc. it is pleasing to watch to say at the least.🙂🙂😊

  23. I really don’t see why people would even want skyscrapers… big high rises = dark, depressing ‘sunlightless’ ground

    P.s. if you had to choose between New York vs China for vacation, we all know where we would go.. good ol Merica

  25. It's because in the US we don't care about big corporate symbols of prosperity thrown in our face when we are barely making rent sometimes. ESP if they are gonna use tax dollars. China has a communist govt that just builds to build.

نظرات بسته شده اند.