منتشرشده در خرید vpn ویندوز





با ثبت نام در یک حساب Blinkist رایگان یا پولی ، مستقیماً از PolyMatter پشتیبانی کنید:

پاترون:
توییتر:
Reddit:
اختلاف:

روشی که شما در مورد سیاست صحبت می کنید ممکن است کاملاً توجیه شود ، اما آیا به اهداف شما کمک می کند یا به آن آسیب می رساند؟

* پایان این فیلم شامل یک تبلیغات با حمایت مالی می شود. این شرکت هیچ بخشی در نوشتن ، ویرایش یا تولید بقیه ویدیوها نداشته است.

### وام ###
طراحی صدا توسط جاستین ولگراون: www.justinwelgraven.com
موسیقی سوناتای مهتاب توسط بتهوون است
مطالعه r / CMV و داده ها از
منابع مهم دیگر: ، ،. ،

لینک دانلود

تگ ها:

29 پاسخ به “چگونه سیاست انجام دهیم”

  1. As someone who doesn’t use Facebook, I’m curious: Where is the worst for angry and unproductive politics? My guess is Facebook, but I also see a lot on Twitter, and I wonder if the character limit helps or hurts in this respect.

  5. I always make it a point to research my positions. Sometimes it takes me a while, but eventually, I come to the most logical position.

    Take De-regulation; This is a very simplified explanation of deregulation and it is far more complicated but in general: too much de-regulation causes asset bubbles which leads to boom-bust cycles and hurts the workers as well as the economy (wealth gap increases and likely causes monopolies), but just the right amount (paired with good regulation on how companies treat workers) can protect workers whilst increasing the GDP, can stabilize the economy, protect the environment, provide low cost goods and services for all, and stop businesses from taking advantage of the government and the consumer. Too much regulation costs the economy big time and hurts the economy/consumers in a completely different way, but the damage is much less than too much deregulation.
    All in all, In would prefer a government that regulated in some areas of the economy (healthcare, environment, workers protections, some social issues etc) while simultaneously de-regulating other areas of the economy.

    Too many regulations undermine the entire goal of regulation; to benefit the social well being of the people. It's like the pacifist issue.
    EDIT: lol nobody is going to read this

  6. "A pacifist is someone who is committed to none violence, but a true believer is someone who accepts the violence that prevents greater atrocities."
    Oof, That one is going to stick. I love it.

  18. One day I hope I can behind that podium protecting Americas rights as a Congressman, Ambassador, Senator, and President. I personally have passion for the gov. and politics and I hope to get a degree in political science and put it to use.

  23. i tell people this and they tell me that im just ignorant and to shut up. that’s why im going to major in political science to continue to learn ab politics and be less and less close minded.

  25. There's actually a strategy called Mobying where a person tries to infiltrate a social/political group and then takes the most socially unacceptable or decisive stance on a hot topic in order to divide and sow strife among said social group. I despise it for its deceptiveness, but I think it happens a lot, and it plays off ideas in this video a bit.
    Really nice video and quite helpful

  26. Haha I clicked cuz I saw my county’s flag and thought it might be mentioned 😂 kind of glad it wasn’t, politics isn’t looking so good right now 🙁

نظرات بسته شده اند.