28 پاسخ به “7 قوی ترین موتورهای جدید”

1. But do any of them utilize a Turbo Encabulator?

2. One word to make all of em obsolete… "Tesla"

3. Fossil fuel motors are out.

4. I think you may find this interesting
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09s49xKZCiA

5. What ever happened to the K Cycle engine? How many of these are going to fade into obscurity like it did.

6. have any that work by themselves? no air line or electric motor running it?

7. Circus in Town%?

8. You know we are running out of oil aye

9. الثاني حق ارامكو ✌🏻

10. L a n e

11. New designs lead to real innovations, but we cant just pursue efficiency and toss durability out of the window.

12. 5:00 wrong 40 lb pisto

13. All about Mechanical Engineering
    mechanicaleducation0.blogspot.com

14. The circle cycle engine 1:00 reminds me of when sex gets too aggressive and you start catching air between strokes … Any guy can tell you how DISASTROUS this can be if you miss!

15. Correction: Rocket engines and other space propulsion systems do not have a "maximum velocity" they can reach, rather they have a maximum efficiency they can achieve. in theory, for a given payload of weight Mp, any type of thruster (chemical, ion, or otherwise) can reach any velocity, it just takes a different mass of fuel, Mf, to get there for engines of varying efficiency. The efficiency, Isp, is measured is meters per second, however its not actually referring to a literal velocity, it's just how the units work out (sometimes its referred to as effective exhaust velocity, but this is just a name, and a confusing one at that). What Isp really represents is the amount of force generated for each kg/s of fuel flow. On any engine, if you increase fuel flow, you increase thrust. But the better the Isp, the more thrust you get for that increase. Now we have everything we need to find out how fast we can go if we know Mp, Mf, and Isp. To find the change in velocity, delta_V, capable, we use the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation, which states:
    delta_V = Isp * ln(Mt/Mp)
    where the total starting mass is Mt = Mp + Mf
    For chemical rockets, the theoretical maximum Isp is around 5,000 m/s while the highest recorded Isp of any ion engine (as far as I am aware) was 189,333 m/s from the DS4G thruster developed by the ESA.

16. it actually tends to prematurely explode when the mix is lean.

17. Check this cool motor out! https://youtu.be/mDkNYe1r8Rc

18. Electric motors are the future. ICE are the past.

19. Why don't they make engines with hearts, then?

20. 📲*00212.645.75.23.01* *whatapps*📲
    ولاحـظــت💁‍♂️ كــثــيــر مـن الـكـومـنـتـات عـن تــكــبــيــر الـقـضـيـب وضـعـف الانــتــصــاب وسـرعـة الـقـذف
    وأبـغـى أبـشـركـم😉 أنــي حــصــلــت عــلــى مـعـلـومـات مـفـيـدة✅ هـتـنـفـعـكـم كـثـيـر ومـجـربـهـا كـمـان ونــفــعــتــنــي🤩🥳
    تــواصــل مـعـي🙋‍♂️ وأنـا بـشـرح لـك سـر الـوصـفـة الـواتـس اب *00212645752301*📲

21. Good job !!! Thanks

22. I want no part of fixing the bottom end of that VC Turbo. Looks more complex than tuning all six Webber carbs on a Ferrari 3.0L Columbo.

23. Number 6 is very interesting

24. Imagine a pushrod iron block v8

25. I think we should just stick with the regular cylinder engine

26. ok.. put a piston that ratchets a crankshaft ??? omfg the noise would be insane at 100 rpm let alone 2000 where the whole thing rips itself apart trying to move the vehicle or the locking lug on the axle would just fail..

    remember kids… follow the kiss principle or end up with a 50 billion part thing with 40 million more parts that can fail.
    KISS = Keep It Simple Stupid for anyone who never heard of it.

27. Needs more ion engines

28. That last one would heat up and jam and detonate

نظرات بسته شده اند.