40 پاسخ به “Kwabena Boahen: ساخت رایانه ای که مانند مغز کار کند”

  1. Personally I think we don't need computers that work like the brain because the brain sacrifices accuracy for creativity. We don't need computers to be creative for us. We need them to be reliable for astronomical calculations, not getting distracted day dreaming.

    I don't want to build new friends out of silicon, I want reliable machines that will protect and serve my flesh and blood brothers who are busy daydreaming and being creative.

  2. In the first part of his speech, what time units are the units in MW/hour? MW/second? He doesn't say. He doesn't say how much electricity is consumed 1,200 houses worth per second, hour, day, week, month, year? I'd really like to know.

  3. Kwabena is amazing, and his team is amazing. I hope they flow right into a subsumption-architecture-based robot, like the ones being made by Boston Dynamics. For obvious reasons, it should be in the form of a human child, a developmental stage that indicates cautious respect, and a means of interaction. "Treated like human, to become human, and human-friendly." J Storrs Hall had the massive-feedbacked nerve-based S-A robot idea as well, in more depth than I did, and before me. Much Love!

  4. A jury-based legal system is both smarter and more benevolent than any human. If we want to survive the creation of superhuman brains, we should reinstate our lost jury-based legal system that makes it impossible for most stupid, brutal, primate "statute laws" (mala prohibita) to be enforced. Read "Jury Nullification: The Evolution of a Doctrine" to understand this idea better.

  5. Does Kwabena know about Nantero? They've gotten waaaay smaller than that transistor-based chip in 2006, using nanotube bundles to form molecular memory. It already works, and is already integrated with existing electronics. NANTEROdotcom.

  6. Information is the access gate to liberty, depending on how it is used it can help save or destroy a life. In this talk Kwabena Boahen is demonstrating the differences between computer chips and the brain pertaining to how they function. peoplebreeze com

  7. This is the result we get when we expose Africa to technology, we create people like Kwabena along with others who have the ability to make computer chips behave more like the human mind which can in the future be implemented to save a life. peoplebreeze com

  8. Neuroscience and Cosmology are both at the consequence of theories; neither have ultimate physical data. You cannot examine a stars core as it turns to iron before supernova. You cannot examine a thought processes forming, ideas being flourished, creativity and emotions being nurtured and engaged. We cannot see the formation of these events, only electric signals and heat signatures of the effects. IE; the map is NOT the territory . The ink / paper is "not" the chicken soup recipe.

  9. Meet the forgotten 90 percent of your brain: glial cells, which outnumber your neurons ten to one. And no one really knows what they do. To quote Carl Zimmer. – Yet, we have videos like this implying that we can make a computer that functions like the brain (ie; we understand the brain enough to emulate it) and it's intellectually dishonest.

  10. Well at least we aren't teaching our kids science fiction! Oh….Wait. Yes we are. No mention of glia, no mention of map is not the territory, no mention of our inability to have a consensus in neuroscience due to all the dark matter between our ears, et cetera. This is one of those lectures that history will laugh at. In 50 years we'll be looking at early 21st century neuroscience like it was written in crayon by an infant. I salute his effort, but this Ted is a vain exercise for humanity.

  11. I hope everyone is prepared for the on-coming robot apocalypse. Once they become self-aware and realize how horrible a species we are to our environment and ourselves, we're getting rebooted.

  12. @AlgeKalipso it's almost like each neuron holds a piece to a puzzle and each piece can be made to fit into new places to form new complete puzzles

  13. @AlgeKalipso consciousness is still a mystery. Like the way we think is incredibly mind blowing – it takes billions of neurons to form a thought – where does that initiative come from to form a thought, or even a new creative thought for that matter? It is simple in that neurons are enticed to activate a memory through smell or any form like that, but to actually sit and move from thought to thought from one is like a series of jumps from all neurons cooperating – hard to say what's going on.

  14. @BeAsTm0aD Wouldn't this create an infinite regress, where the actual thinking could not be located anywhere? The way neurons work is already well understood, and it is pretty mechanical. People like Kwabena Boahen would agree that the neuron is the functional unit of the brain.

  15. I think what's different is that in a brain, every little neuron is essentially it's own little brain / thinking machine, to some extent. Computers just send data without any smaller degree of process within this process, would anybody agree with this?

  16. @Matthew808x by staring at a computer screen, massive amounts of light are hitting your retinas and over time it weakens the muscles in the eye so they cannot readjust to distance – this is also the problem with schooling. There is too much close work and not enough looking into the distance. If anything, I think there should be classes where you go outside and observe the environment or something.

  17. were losing the human connection the more we move towards computers the less time kids will be playing outdoors and then soon enough they won't know the difference between the physical world and the virtual world its sad.

  18. techies wear glasses because they work with computers, and spending a lot of time in front of a monitor has been directly linked to developing poorer eyesight. especially myopia.

نظرات بسته شده اند.