Conversation with Mr. #Benisadr and Ali # Sadat – The Power and the Alienation of Guiding Thought, Liberalism, Ownership
A talking chest
Date of production: September 1, equal to September 5, Monday
❊
Content link address on Ali Sadat site for access to links on other social networking sites and for comment (likes), likes (dislikes) or dislikes, and comments:
❊
Compact audio file for Iran, for telegram comment:
❊
… ..The evolution of liberalism continued until it turned upside down to the idea it was at the beginning. This self-alienation and depletion justifies the power of liberalism. The justifying role of power, its task is to deny natural rights and even the right to life of the poor: Again, historically, liberalism was thought to guide the fighters who were at the forefront of the struggle for feudal privileges. He thought of his individualism and human property as his work and considered it universal. Since then, it is because of the thought of guiding the liberal government and capitalism to become "liberal" that it is changing nature.
The human relation to the self becomes the owner-property relation: rights are considered property and belong to the individual: the individual has the same rights as he owns his own life: “Rights are typically in the possession or possession of or by the individual. They understand. " Yet alienation itself contradicts itself: rights are not material possessions, they are inherent in life. According to the book's author, "Rights are concepts, how can concepts be acquired". And because the issue of privatizing property with natural rights does not apply, liberals, under the influence of positivism, reject natural rights.
The Justification of Poverty: "One of the natural consequences of freedom is that those who are deprived are also … industry and commerce are the real parents of poverty." Edwin Chadwick says: "Just as labor is the source of wealth, poverty is also the source of labor, eradicate poverty, wealth disappears." Therefore, the government should not act to eradicate poverty for three reasons: first, that freedom of choice is restricted, and, second, that not only the responsibility to find work, but also the motivation to lose it, and third, that inadvertent interference with market rules are laws. Which, like other natural laws, are the result of scientific discoveries. Freedom and personal responsibility and science, all three, dictate that "the poor should be left alone." The liberal theorist who said, "The poor should be left to their own devices, and their emptiness is the work of divine providence and the rule of science," was Bork. And he adds the fourth reason (divine providence) to the earlier reasons.
Thus, in this period, liberal scholars see not only the contradiction between freedom and poverty, but also that poverty is a product of the necessity of freedom. And of course, violence against the poor is prescribed: "Violence against the poor is part of the hidden and undisclosed history of liberalism" … ..
❊
Thank you very much for your attention
If you disagree with the text / audio / video content and service you provide, and consider it a step-by-step, albeit very small, one for a violent cultural endeavor for the freedom and independence of the homeland, in its broadcast ( Help us at least by sharing it with email and social networking.
Democracy is not conceivable in any country without a culture of democracy. Until we change, we cannot change.
It is not possible to establish and maintain democracy in the homeland without engaging in cultural and media affairs, and without participating in the spontaneous movement (and trying to make it more inclusive).
It is not necessary to build a better fate, to gain power and to seize power.
To build a better and better fate, you and I and every one of us people must do something, no matter how small it may seem.
SENIOR: People must do something! what should we do?#
Get podcast content automatically: