39 پاسخ به “ربات تنیس روی میز Amicus جدید از Butterfly”

  1. People asking questions about the product on a YouTube video comment section make me laugh. Too lazy to go to the company website and actually contact customer service with your questions, or do any research whatsoever lol.

  2. Hello people! Especially kind one,
    Is it really useful for training?
    Unfortunately can’t train with people, but wanna augment my skills.
    If so, are there cheaper alternative on the market?
    Thanks in advance

  3. Dear #TamasuButterfly…These stuffs are great but yet we cant get an idea about the spin of the ball or the nature of the shot. In a natural match by looking at the player the way he put the strength on the ball we can get an idea about the speed and spin of the ball…
    So your next level should touch this component also. You can combine the machine with hologram technology to make a tt player near the table so the machine can produce balls such a way that it seems like producing from the raquet of that player….
    Think of it. Just an idea

  4. Is it possible that this robot throw balls for examle firts one in topspin and second one is backspin? I mean do I have to make something that I can have topspin after backspin?

  5. How noisy?

    From other videos of the new Amicus and online reports the there is a high pitch ping or clicking sound as the ball leaves the robot. Most reports say this makes the robot a little noisier than some models but not so bad that it causes too much distraction. Since there is other noises such as wheels  and motors spinning an extra ping as the ball is launched may be similar in volume to a bat hitting a ball. 

    If the motors were to be made a quieter and you just heard the ping sound the overall noise level could be be about the same as playing against a human player with the ping replacing the clack or slap of bat hitting ball. 

    I think the SmartPong and DoubleSnake are quieter than the new Amicus based on reports I have read, and online film clips with sound.

  6. re: robots do not serve?

    The new Amicus and many other "robots" can simulate serves that bounce on both sides of the table. Some players produce variable serves that look similar from the same action even when they land on the same place. E.g. I have a service that varies from left top to right underspin depending on when I contact the ball.  

    With the old Amicus and SmartPong the positioning of the heads give you a general idea of what spin is being served. With the new Amicus this is harder to do. I suspect the new Amicus hardware is capable of being a very good serving machine. The question is whether the software in the Pro control box is smart enough.

    Some servers just have 3 basic variations of their serve two (or three) that look similar but have large spin variation such as side (or float) and chop and another that goes quickly to an unexpected location to catch players flat footed e.g. deep fast serve that has similar start of stroke action.

    I suspect the new Amicus could be easily programmed to do such serves in a random action. If not a new box could be programmed just to do serves and sold as an option for the system. 

    Some robots have had people rewire them to take instructions from mobile phones and other computers. Presumably Butterfly or some hacker could program in hundreds of different serves that come from one "random serve" button.

  7. Are there any robots that can serve from different places?
    I thought I saw a video once where the robot moved across the table to send balls from different angles. Are there any things the Smart Pong does that this robot can not do?

نظرات بسته شده اند.