منتشرشده در خرید vpn ویندوز





مجموعه ای از ردپای که در حدود 900000 سال پیش توسط انسان های اولیه باقی مانده است توسط تیمی از دانشمندان به رهبری موزه بریتانیا ، موزه تاریخ طبیعی و دانشگاه کوئین مری لندن کشف شده است. ردپاهای به جای مانده در لجن خورهای باستانی در هاپسبورگ در نورفولک یافت شد و شواهد مستقیمی از نخستین انسانهای شناخته شده در شمال اروپا است. اطلاعات بیشتری در مورد این کشف کسب کنید:.

لینک دانلود

تگ ها:

33 پاسخ به “قدیمی ترین ردپای انسان در اروپا | موزه تاریخ طبیعی”

  3. Ply in the rain and mud as a child, and they make you stop. But, if you are smart, you cn do it as an adult and they will pay you well, and call you a scientist..

  19. If these are the footprints of humans or human like then such footprints have to be found elsewhere to substantiate the evidence? If not, then, well, well tryed, yes, that is old English spoken by these people.

  23. Its incredible the racism that still continues today from white scientists

    DNA HAS ALREADY PROVEN WHITE PEOPLE ARE NOT!!! NOT!!!! NOT!!! INDIGENOUS TO EUROPE!!!

    the first european were AFRICAN!!
    the first Americans were AFRICAN!!!

    this whole planet at one time was BLACK!!!!!!!!!!!!

    white people would have you believe that despite the fact that Africans lived on planet earth for 2 MILLION YEARS BEFORE WHITE PEOPLE the Africans decided to stay only in Africa and NOT develop writing, language and culture until white people showed up is absolutely ridiculous its just stinks of white supremacy

    one of the biggest cover ups of all time by white people is the fact that at one time this planet was UNITED BY A GLOBAL AFRICAN CULTURE!!

    Stonehenge was built by AFRICANS!!! the same configuration at stone henge has been found in AFRICA and the AMERICAS around ancient fossils of black people

    how the hell is white people going to claim Stonehenge as their own when they don't even have a clue to what it means when all you have to do is study Olmec, Egyptian, Nubian and Ethiopian culture to know exactly what stone henge is

    BLACK PLANET, BLACK TRUTH, BLACK POWER!!!

  26. The title should be "Earliest human footprints FOUND outside Africa" because obviously these humans had to travel through Europe to get to Norfolk. There will be much older foot prints elsewhere in Europe and the Middle East. Also are they really human if they are 800,000 years old? Neanderthals and Modern Humans only split up into different groups/species 300,000 years ago, and the different races alive today split up 200,000 years ago. So at 800,000 years old these humans are more ape like, more primitive than modern humans and neanderthals.

  31. Anyone who has studied paeleoanthropology and is avid reader in the field will understand that there has been A LOT of fossil finds and footprints in the 800,000 years period to the present. There is the Boxgrove culture, Sierra de Atapuerca, Suffolk culture, Zhoukoudian, Altamura, Schoningen, Terra Amata localities. And nearby Western Asia alone has a rich paeleolithic culture beginning about 1,800,000 BCE with Homo georgicus (or Homo erectus) of Dmanisi, Georgia. These were primitive human species that were not ancestral to modern humans. We have our roots in Africa at about 193,000 BCE before spreading out of Africa beginning 58,000 BCE. It is important to stress (just in case) that no one makes these up but we just find them and interpret them. What these fossils show clearly is that the world, indeed life is exceedingly ancient and we barely know anything about it. It is not surprising to see footprints dating back 800,000 years, just because we have lifetimes of only a few decades and written history beginning circa 4000 BCE, it shows the narrow scope of time that we are familiar and comfortable with. Time is unforgiving and relentless and leaves everything behind. To note Dinosaurs became extinct by about 66,000,000 BCE and so it follows that we (most of us) have no 'sense' or knowledge of the depth of time and history. 

  32. I think it would be very helpful to the science education of the public, particularly students, for the finders to explain just how they arrived at the foot prints being about 800,000 years old.  I read several other accounts in the media , and they all gave this estimated age, but none of them explained how it was arrived at.  They should also list possible sources of error and their estimates as to how this leads to a plus-minus correction to the above age, or possibly reasons for believing that the age  can be no less than 800, 000 years. How scientists arrive at their numbers is fundamental, as is true in financial transactions as well.

نظرات بسته شده اند.