31 پاسخ به “جورج دایسون: تولد رایانه”

  1. @BIKabballa I remember coding in C++ on a 286SX computer with 256KB of RAM. The computer was so slow that I coded most of the day in and put the program to compile to go eat, and it still wouldn't have finished compiling by the time I was done

  2. @CadicusTheDamned

    People's misconceptions…it's all crap. My sister works in a lab that does stem cell research at USC & the women there are all HOT. All of the departments in this big research facility get together for parties on a regular basis & they all drink lots of alcohol. When it comes to work they all work very hard but when it comes time to relax they party…professionals in various fields of science in the 21st century are far from the dull cliche depictions in 20th century films.

  3. @ koneye – I agree with your point of not only passively accepting information but to actually process it in an active and inquisitive way, but you could go about stating that without offending most of the commenters here.

  4. So b4 you start posting ur uninformed and incompetent thoughts, do a simple research It is people like u that believ tha mass media and can't form their own opinion that close ur eyes for the real world surrounding u , u better get you story str8 and dont just beleiv the corrupt manufactured news u get from TV
    It is people like you that say that the conspiracies of all the sectors of your life are nothing but that – the truth is out there and it IS available – for the one who seeks he finds!!!

  5. This guy talks about a 1656 T.H. who speaks about the idea for computing machine(calculator) and the jumps all the way to after WW2 saying that Neuman build the first computer 1946 – and basicly this way he denies all the presesors of this machine, such as
    -Zuse Z3 (Germany) 1941
    -AtanasoffBerry Computer (US)1941
    -Colossus (UK)1944
    Not to mention that AtanasoffBerry Computer was oficialy recognized as the first modern type of computer

  6. 33 comments of bunch of followers that take everything they see some were for the truth like blind baths this guys presentation is full with information holes and it's obviouslly not an objective opinion
    but rather an subclusion of one person view on that matter , and you all just blindly take it for the truth withouth even challeging his view and withouth doing a simple reserch as to type "first computer" in google and see what happens , and dont take the first few line for undeniable proof

  7. oh i don't know, the developer logs were quite funny, not a lot has changed in the mindset since those early days.

    Hehe, i especially liked the reference to the missing sugar.

    No doubt at all in my mind that these guys were the pioneers of the future.

نظرات بسته شده اند.